Lung Cancer Screening May Be More Cost-Effective When Using Risk Model–Based Strategies

Janssen Presents First-ever Results from Dual Bispecific Combination Study Showing 96 Percent Overall Response Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Phase 1 Trial of KN046, a Novel Bispecific Antibody Targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

HD201 Comparable to Referent Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Preclinical Characterization and Phase 1 Trial Results of INBRX-109, a Third-generation, Recombinant, Humanized, Death Receptor 5 Agonist Antibody, in Chondrosarcoma

IMscin001 Part 2: A Randomised Phase 3, Open-label, Multicentre Study Examining the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Atezolizumab Subcutaneous versus Intravenous in Previously Treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC

Menstrual Suppression in the Myelosuppressed: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib and Temozolomide as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Acral Melanoma

Lung Cancer Screening May Be More Cost-Effective When Using Risk Model–Based Strategies

header-info

Feb, 09, 2023

Risk model–based lung cancer screening strategies may be more cost-effective than current recommendations that are based solely on the patient’s age and smoking history, according to a new study published by Toumazis et al in the Annals of Internal Medicine.